I love clothing, but I would rather spend $495 on some Minolo Blahnik’s than $88 on a belt. I’m not into belts.BR/BR/Ok, I’m so tired I can’t think straight today.
Scoop, oh, how well you know! BR/BR/It’s REALLY bad when the jeans you’re trying to grab and keep up are zipped inside a ski jacket… one that covers your hips (so at least if the pants go, you’re still covered).BR/BR/Yeah, guys, I’d have preferred to spend less. But man, this is a BELT. I love it, and that alone makes it a bargain.
Amy Ruttan
April 10, 2007 7:58 pm
I love clothing, but I would rather spend $495 on some Minolo Blahnik’s than $88 on a belt. I’m not into belts.BR/BR/Ok, I’m so tired I can’t think straight today.
Susan Helene Gottfried
April 10, 2007 8:35 pm
I’m usually not into belts, either, but man, I was tired of hiking my pants back up!
spyscribbler
April 10, 2007 11:08 pm
LOLOL … Susan, you crack me up! 🙂
cheesygiraffe
April 11, 2007 8:45 am
Holy cow! $88 on a belt? Why can’t you get a cheaper one? :PBR/I’m way cheaper can’t you tell? hehe
scooper
April 11, 2007 9:53 am
Ever been in the grocery store and feel your pants sliding over your hips? It sucks! Once over the hip bump, they’re just a strait fall to the ground.
L^2
April 11, 2007 10:29 am
LOL! I would never spend $88 on a belt, but lately I could definitely use one and/or some new smaller jeans.
Susan Helene Gottfried
April 11, 2007 11:17 am
Scoop, oh, how well you know! BR/BR/It’s REALLY bad when the jeans you’re trying to grab and keep up are zipped inside a ski jacket… one that covers your hips (so at least if the pants go, you’re still covered).BR/BR/Yeah, guys, I’d have preferred to spend less. But man, this is a BELT. I love it, and that alone makes it a bargain.
nimrodiel
April 11, 2007 3:34 pm
I can understand the price though, those belt shown on the web site are fantastic.BR/BR/You are very lucky to have such a talanted artist nearby 🙂